2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
"""Handle outputting raw frigate frames"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
import datetime
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
import logging
|
2024-03-05 22:56:38 +03:00
|
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
|
import shutil
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
import threading
|
|
|
|
|
from wsgiref.simple_server import make_server
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from ws4py.server.wsgirefserver import (
|
|
|
|
|
WebSocketWSGIHandler,
|
|
|
|
|
WebSocketWSGIRequestHandler,
|
|
|
|
|
WSGIServer,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
from ws4py.server.wsgiutils import WebSocketWSGIApplication
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
import frigate.util as util
|
2024-02-19 16:26:59 +03:00
|
|
|
from frigate.comms.detections_updater import DetectionSubscriber, DetectionTypeEnum
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
from frigate.comms.ws import WebSocket
|
|
|
|
|
from frigate.config import FrigateConfig
|
2025-05-22 21:16:51 +03:00
|
|
|
from frigate.config.camera.updater import (
|
|
|
|
|
CameraConfigUpdateEnum,
|
|
|
|
|
CameraConfigUpdateSubscriber,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2024-03-05 22:56:38 +03:00
|
|
|
from frigate.const import CACHE_DIR, CLIPS_DIR
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
from frigate.output.birdseye import Birdseye
|
|
|
|
|
from frigate.output.camera import JsmpegCamera
|
|
|
|
|
from frigate.output.preview import PreviewRecorder
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
from frigate.util.image import SharedMemoryFrameManager, get_blank_yuv_frame
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
def check_disabled_camera_update(
|
|
|
|
|
config: FrigateConfig,
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye: Birdseye | None,
|
|
|
|
|
previews: dict[str, PreviewRecorder],
|
|
|
|
|
write_times: dict[str, float],
|
|
|
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Check if camera is disabled / offline and needs an update."""
|
|
|
|
|
now = datetime.datetime.now().timestamp()
|
|
|
|
|
has_enabled_camera = False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for camera, last_update in write_times.items():
|
2025-03-05 17:07:48 +03:00
|
|
|
offline_time = now - last_update
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
if config.cameras[camera].enabled:
|
|
|
|
|
has_enabled_camera = True
|
2025-03-05 17:07:48 +03:00
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
# flag camera as offline when it is disabled
|
|
|
|
|
previews[camera].flag_offline(now)
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2025-03-05 17:07:48 +03:00
|
|
|
if offline_time > 1:
|
|
|
|
|
# last camera update was more than 1 second ago
|
|
|
|
|
# need to send empty data to birdseye because current
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
# frame is now out of date
|
2025-03-05 17:07:48 +03:00
|
|
|
if birdseye and offline_time < 10:
|
|
|
|
|
# we only need to send blank frames to birdseye at the beginning of a camera being offline
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye.write_data(
|
|
|
|
|
camera,
|
|
|
|
|
[],
|
|
|
|
|
[],
|
|
|
|
|
now,
|
|
|
|
|
get_blank_yuv_frame(
|
|
|
|
|
config.cameras[camera].detect.width,
|
|
|
|
|
config.cameras[camera].detect.height,
|
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2025-03-04 00:05:49 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not has_enabled_camera and birdseye:
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye.all_cameras_disabled()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
class OutputProcess(util.Process):
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, config: FrigateConfig) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
super().__init__(name="frigate.output", daemon=True)
|
|
|
|
|
self.config = config
|
2025-03-03 18:30:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
def run(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
self.pre_run_setup()
|
2024-02-19 16:26:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
frame_manager = SharedMemoryFrameManager()
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
# start a websocket server on 8082
|
|
|
|
|
WebSocketWSGIHandler.http_version = "1.1"
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_server = make_server(
|
|
|
|
|
"127.0.0.1",
|
|
|
|
|
8082,
|
|
|
|
|
server_class=WSGIServer,
|
|
|
|
|
handler_class=WebSocketWSGIRequestHandler,
|
|
|
|
|
app=WebSocketWSGIApplication(handler_cls=WebSocket),
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_server.initialize_websockets_manager()
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_thread = threading.Thread(target=websocket_server.serve_forever)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
detection_subscriber = DetectionSubscriber(DetectionTypeEnum.video)
|
|
|
|
|
config_subscriber = CameraConfigUpdateSubscriber(
|
|
|
|
|
self.config,
|
|
|
|
|
self.config.cameras,
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
CameraConfigUpdateEnum.add,
|
|
|
|
|
CameraConfigUpdateEnum.birdseye,
|
|
|
|
|
CameraConfigUpdateEnum.enabled,
|
|
|
|
|
CameraConfigUpdateEnum.record,
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2024-02-19 16:26:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
jsmpeg_cameras: dict[str, JsmpegCamera] = {}
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye: Birdseye | None = None
|
|
|
|
|
preview_recorders: dict[str, PreviewRecorder] = {}
|
|
|
|
|
preview_write_times: dict[str, float] = {}
|
|
|
|
|
failed_frame_requests: dict[str, int] = {}
|
|
|
|
|
last_disabled_cam_check = datetime.datetime.now().timestamp()
|
2025-03-03 18:30:52 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
move_preview_frames("cache")
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
for camera, cam_config in self.config.cameras.items():
|
|
|
|
|
if not cam_config.enabled_in_config:
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2024-11-06 16:59:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
jsmpeg_cameras[camera] = JsmpegCamera(
|
|
|
|
|
cam_config, self.stop_event, websocket_server
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
preview_recorders[camera] = PreviewRecorder(cam_config)
|
|
|
|
|
preview_write_times[camera] = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if self.config.birdseye.enabled:
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye = Birdseye(self.config, self.stop_event, websocket_server)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_thread.start()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while not self.stop_event.is_set():
|
|
|
|
|
# check if there is an updated config
|
|
|
|
|
updates = config_subscriber.check_for_updates()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if "add" in updates:
|
|
|
|
|
for camera in updates["add"]:
|
|
|
|
|
jsmpeg_cameras[camera] = JsmpegCamera(
|
|
|
|
|
cam_config, self.stop_event, websocket_server
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
preview_recorders[camera] = PreviewRecorder(cam_config)
|
|
|
|
|
preview_write_times[camera] = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(topic, data) = detection_subscriber.check_for_update(timeout=1)
|
|
|
|
|
now = datetime.datetime.now().timestamp()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if now - last_disabled_cam_check > 5:
|
|
|
|
|
# check disabled cameras every 5 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
last_disabled_cam_check = now
|
|
|
|
|
check_disabled_camera_update(
|
|
|
|
|
self.config, birdseye, preview_recorders, preview_write_times
|
2024-11-06 16:59:33 +03:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
if not topic:
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2024-09-03 19:22:30 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
(
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
camera,
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
frame_name,
|
|
|
|
|
frame_time,
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
current_tracked_objects,
|
|
|
|
|
motion_boxes,
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
_,
|
|
|
|
|
) = data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not self.config.cameras[camera].enabled:
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frame = frame_manager.get(
|
|
|
|
|
frame_name, self.config.cameras[camera].frame_shape_yuv
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if frame is None:
|
|
|
|
|
logger.debug(f"Failed to get frame {frame_name} from SHM")
|
|
|
|
|
failed_frame_requests[camera] = failed_frame_requests.get(camera, 0) + 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
|
|
|
failed_frame_requests[camera]
|
|
|
|
|
> self.config.cameras[camera].detect.fps
|
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
|
logger.warning(
|
|
|
|
|
f"Failed to retrieve many frames for {camera} from SHM, consider increasing SHM size if this continues."
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
|
failed_frame_requests[camera] = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# send frames for low fps recording
|
|
|
|
|
preview_recorders[camera].write_data(
|
|
|
|
|
current_tracked_objects, motion_boxes, frame_time, frame
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
)
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
preview_write_times[camera] = frame_time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# send camera frame to ffmpeg process if websockets are connected
|
|
|
|
|
if any(
|
|
|
|
|
ws.environ["PATH_INFO"].endswith(camera)
|
|
|
|
|
for ws in websocket_server.manager
|
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
|
# write to the converter for the camera if clients are listening to the specific camera
|
|
|
|
|
jsmpeg_cameras[camera].write_frame(frame.tobytes())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# send output data to birdseye if websocket is connected or restreaming
|
|
|
|
|
if self.config.birdseye.enabled and (
|
|
|
|
|
self.config.birdseye.restream
|
|
|
|
|
or any(
|
|
|
|
|
ws.environ["PATH_INFO"].endswith("birdseye")
|
|
|
|
|
for ws in websocket_server.manager
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye.write_data(
|
|
|
|
|
camera,
|
|
|
|
|
current_tracked_objects,
|
|
|
|
|
motion_boxes,
|
|
|
|
|
frame_time,
|
|
|
|
|
frame,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
frame_manager.close(frame_name)
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
move_preview_frames("clips")
|
2024-03-23 22:45:15 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
while True:
|
|
|
|
|
(topic, data) = detection_subscriber.check_for_update(timeout=0)
|
2024-02-19 16:26:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
if not topic:
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
2024-02-19 16:26:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
camera,
|
|
|
|
|
frame_name,
|
|
|
|
|
frame_time,
|
|
|
|
|
current_tracked_objects,
|
|
|
|
|
motion_boxes,
|
|
|
|
|
regions,
|
|
|
|
|
) = data
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
frame = frame_manager.get(
|
|
|
|
|
frame_name, self.config.cameras[camera].frame_shape_yuv
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
frame_manager.close(frame_name)
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
detection_subscriber.stop()
|
2024-02-19 16:26:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
for jsmpeg in jsmpeg_cameras.values():
|
|
|
|
|
jsmpeg.stop()
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
for preview in preview_recorders.values():
|
|
|
|
|
preview.stop()
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
if birdseye is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
birdseye.stop()
|
2023-12-03 17:16:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Use Fork-Server As Spawn Method (#18682)
* Set runtime
* Use count correctly
* Don't assume camera sizes
* Use separate zmq proxy for object detection
* Correct order
* Use forkserver
* Only store PID instead of entire process reference
* Cleanup
* Catch correct errors
* Fix typing
* Remove before_run from process util
The before_run never actually ran because:
You're right to suspect an issue with before_run not being called and a potential deadlock. The way you've implemented the run_wrapper using __getattribute__ for the run method of BaseProcess is a common pitfall in Python's multiprocessing, especially when combined with how multiprocessing.Process works internally.
Here's a breakdown of why before_run isn't being called and why you might be experiencing a deadlock:
The Problem: __getattribute__ and Process Serialization
When you create a multiprocessing.Process object and call start(), the multiprocessing module needs to serialize the process object (or at least enough of it to re-create the process in the new interpreter). It then pickles this serialized object and sends it to the newly spawned process.
The issue with your __getattribute__ implementation for run is that:
run is retrieved during serialization: When multiprocessing tries to pickle your Process object to send to the new process, it will likely access the run attribute. This triggers your __getattribute__ wrapper, which then tries to bind run_wrapper to self.
run_wrapper is bound to the parent process's self: The run_wrapper closure, when created in the parent process, captures the self (the Process instance) from the parent's memory space.
Deserialization creates a new object: In the child process, a new Process object is created by deserializing the pickled data. However, the run_wrapper method that was pickled still holds a reference to the self from the parent process. This is a subtle but critical distinction.
The child's run is not your wrapped run: When the child process starts, it internally calls its own run method. Because of the serialization and deserialization process, the run method that's ultimately executed in the child process is the original multiprocessing.Process.run or the Process.run if you had directly overridden it. Your __getattribute__ magic, which wraps run, isn't correctly applied to the Process object within the child's context.
* Cleanup
* Logging bugfix (#18465)
* use mp Manager to handle logging queues
A Python bug (https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91555) was preventing logs from the embeddings maintainer process from printing. The bug is fixed in Python 3.14, but a viable workaround is to use the multiprocessing Manager, which better manages mp queues and causes the logging to work correctly.
* consolidate
* fix typing
* Fix typing
* Use global log queue
* Move to using process for logging
* Convert camera tracking to process
* Add more processes
* Finalize process
* Cleanup
* Cleanup typing
* Formatting
* Remove daemon
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Hawkins <32435876+hawkeye217@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-12 21:12:34 +03:00
|
|
|
config_subscriber.stop()
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_server.manager.close_all()
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_server.manager.stop()
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_server.manager.join()
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_server.shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
websocket_thread.join()
|
|
|
|
|
logger.info("exiting output process...")
|
2024-03-05 22:56:38 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def move_preview_frames(loc: str):
|
|
|
|
|
preview_holdover = os.path.join(CLIPS_DIR, "preview_restart_cache")
|
|
|
|
|
preview_cache = os.path.join(CACHE_DIR, "preview_frames")
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-17 16:56:24 +03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
|
if loc == "clips":
|
|
|
|
|
shutil.move(preview_cache, preview_holdover)
|
|
|
|
|
elif loc == "cache":
|
|
|
|
|
if not os.path.exists(preview_holdover):
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shutil.move(preview_holdover, preview_cache)
|
|
|
|
|
except shutil.Error:
|
|
|
|
|
logger.error("Failed to restore preview cache.")
|